The Australian decisive policy to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring intently to see if this tactic will set a precedent for other nations.
European Movement
Across Europe, a increasing number of nations are exploring parallel restrictions.
- Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM arguing that phones and apps are "taking away our children's childhood". The policy is expected to be passed in the coming year.
- The Norwegian government is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
- Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media account holders. Officials have stated that an Australian-model ban is "one of the measures under consideration".
- In The Spanish government, the president has called on parliament to approve a law increasing the access age for accessing social media to 16.
- In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a related step, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
- The government in The Dutch government has advised families to prevent their children from social media before 15.
Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding statement supporting a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is given. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these platforms, the step does not enact binding law.
"An effective age barrier is a useful first step," said the parliamentarian behind the resolution.
Britain: A Cautious Stance
For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in strong evidence".
Previously, interest gathered behind a bill to impose limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. However, the administration committed to further research the topic.
Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. An organization founded by the relatives of a young person who was lost after viewing dangerous online content contends that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users reach the legal age.
"The Australian ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for minors," said a leading peer.
America: A Fragmented Approach
Across America, legislation is mostly occurring at the regional level against a backdrop of national stalemate.
- Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
- Florida has enacted a law barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
- Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra time needing adult consent.
- Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed bills demanding guardian approval for minors to create social media profiles.
Despite widespread concern and calls from certain individuals to copy this lead, a nationwide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.
Worldwide Outlook
Beyond Europe and the US, further nations are also considering moves.
- Malaysia aims to restrict social media for teenagers effective next year.
- Brazil has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.
Yet, international organizations take a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans have downsides and "might backfire". The agency points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.
Even as this international discussion unfolds, the steps of this nation and its followers show that governments globally are no longer content to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.